Harper government to shrink environmental-assessment process
source: Globe & Mail
by Shawn McCarthy and John Ibbitson
Proposed legislation will streamline and focus on projects of national economic significance; provinces will handle others
The Harper government is about to dramatically shrink the federal oversight of proposed natural resource developments, handing over environmental reviews for many projects to the provinces and cutting back the number of smaller construction projects that are subject to any environmental assessment.
Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver is expected to unveil a sweeping legislative plan on Tuesday that will focus Ottawa's role in environmental assessments to projects it deems to be of national significance.
Read moreCBC The Current on Environmental Assessment
CBC's The Current speaks with three people on environmental assessment in Canada, what's needed, and what's coming from the federal government:
Listen to the podcast here: http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2012/04/04/environmental-assessment-changes/
"Stewart Elgie is a professor of environmental law and economics, and the director of Institute of the Environment at the University of Ottawa. He joined us from our Ottawa studio. Brenda Kenny's industry has a lot at stake in the changes to our environmental assessment regime. She's the president and CEO of the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association, and we reached her at her home in Calgary. And Bruce Pardy is a professor of environmental law at Queens University in Kingston. He was in our Toronto studio."
Read moreNew environmental review rules to apply retroactively
The federal government is contemplating how fast to usher nearly a dozen major resource projects through environmental reviews, after imposing new time limits in the 2012 budget.
Citing the need to boost job creation, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty unveiled changes that would limit the panel review for major projects to 24 months – a process that can take more than six years currently.
National Energy Board hearings will be capped at 18 months and standard environmental assessments will have to wrap in 12 months.
During a media briefing on Thursday, Flaherty confirmed the changes would be applied retroactively to include the controversial Northern Gateway Pipeline.
The Budget's Love Affair With Big Oil
Gillian McEachern, Deputy Campaign Director, Environmental Defence
Everyone knows that there are always winners and losers come federal budget time. Yesterday's budget, however, built on the emerging dynamic in federal politics where Big Oil wins big time at the expense of all Canadians -- our health, our right to open and democratic debate, and our pocketbooks.
Read moreFederal government hides behind budget with changes to environmental assessment
Jamie Kneen, MiningWatch Canada
The Harper Government™ has made no secret of its plan for environmental protection, planning, and assessment; it's a necessary complement to its economic strategy, which essentially consists of extracting as much wealth from the ground as quickly as possible, unencumbered by niceties like public consultation or the free, prior, informed consent of affected Aboriginal peoples.
Ecojustice on the Business News Network (video link)
Devon Page, Executive Director of Ecojustice, speaking pre-budget 2012 annuncement on the impacts of expected changes to Canada's environmental laws (March 29, 2012)
Click here for a link to the Business News Network:video clip
Cutting Up Canada’s Environmental Safety Net
Like rules that prevent smoking in the office or putting your kid in a car without a seatbelt, protecting citizens' health and livelihoods from a polluted environment is a Canadian social norm. Will this week's budget roll back established legal protections for our environment and put public health and safety at risk?
by Jessica Clogg, The Hill Times, Monday March 26, 2012, page 13
Scientists speak out against proposed Fisheries Act changes
Margaret Munro, Postmedia News, Monday March 19, 2012
Scientists are calling on the Harper government to scrap plans to weaken the federal Fisheries Act, saying it will "severely impair" Canada's ability to protect biodiversity and species at risk.
They also want Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield to come clean about what scientists inside his own department think of the proposed changes.
Read moreHealth and safety at risk in environmental assessment changes: critics
Global BC (Canadian Press)
Heather Scoffield, Canadian Press, Monday, February 20, 2012 1:48 PM
OTTAWA - A group of environmental lawyers, doctors and academics says the federal government will endanger health and safety if it curtails the environmental assessment process in a "haphazard" way.
They fear the federal government, in its zeal to streamline approvals for resource projects, is developing a process that would be blind to long-term effects on people and communities.
Read more660 News
660 News
(Ian Campbell, 660 News)
Leading public health physicians, ecologists, environmental lawyers, groups and academics warn it's time to change this country's assessment laws.
Stakeholders fear budget slashing could create dramatic cuts putting both the public's health and safety at risk.
The group has published a list of ten foundational elements that any strong assessment law needs.
Read more

